On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd still like to see us adopt the proposal from some time ago where >> we stop commenting out the parameters at all, but short of that, >> hiding options seems about the worst choice we could make. > > Well, there seems to be a very substantial body of opinion that says > we *do* need to hide "uninteresting" options. >
more to the point... not just "uninteresting" but "dangerous for the uninformed" ones... i have seen to many people turning off fsync in OLTP systems 'cause someone tolds them that will improve speed... and work_mem setted at 256Mb because that improves a bad query that should be rewritten as something more sanely... -- regards, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 87171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers