Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about moving the oid column out of the tuple header. This saves 4 > bytes in the header in cases where there is no oid on the table. No it doesn't --- at least not on machines where MAXALIGN is eight bytes. I don't think this is worth the trouble... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ashley Cambrell
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Philip Warner
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) J-P Guy
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Tom Lane