Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about moving the oid column out of the tuple header. This saves 4
> bytes in the header in cases where there is no oid on the table.
No it doesn't --- at least not on machines where MAXALIGN is eight
bytes.
I don't think this is worth the trouble...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ashley Cambrell
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Philip Warner
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) J-P Guy
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Tom Lane
