On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:49:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Gierth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Tom" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom> That whole business of using the EState to pass tuplestores back > > Tom> and forth looks fundamentally broken to me anyway; there's just > > Tom> no way it'll be certain to link the right nodes together in > > Tom> complicated cases with multiple recursions. > > > Mutual recursion is not allowed; > > Well, the spec allows it, so we're going to have to fix this kluge > sooner or later, even if it chances not to fail on the subset we > currently support.
Any ideas how to approach this? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
