>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> We are not in the business of getting spec-required semantics Tom> 80% right; I guess that's why we still fold identifiers to lowercase, why our timestamp implementation differs from the standard, why we used to require AS for select-list aliases, why our views aren't updateable, why we violate the spec for UNIQUE, why we don't have schema-unique constraint names, why we don't implement MATCH PARTIAL, ... The SQL spec is a Platonic ideal to which _none_ of the implementations are more than a vague approximation. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
