Hello Dann, On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Dann Corbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the cost of one bit of storage, you have compatible types using Thanks for your review and feedback! Unfortunately, I do need the full range of the unsigned types for the project I am looking at. The reason I started working on these types is because it seemed wasteful to use the next size larger signed integer for the storage type of the unsigned integer. Thanks for the suggestion! - Ryan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
