"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why does a collation have a schema? > > Because the SQL spec says so. Also, if we don't put them in schemas, > we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations, > which creates a problem for pg_dump.
Out of curiosity, what is a "user-defined collation"? Are there SQL statements to go around declaring what order code points should be sorted in? That seems like it would be... quite tedious! -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
