In further OT Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Shane Ambler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >> Robert Treat wrote: > >> > >> > >>>> So is that a "golf club gun"? > >>>> > >>> Careful what you wish for.... > >>> http://www.totallyabsurd.com/12gaugegolfclub.htm > >>> > >> I reckon they watched Caddyshack (I think that was the one) and thought > >> they > >> could get the patent before someone actually tried selling them. > >> > > > > Surely a movie counts as "published"!? > > > > > > No the term is "prior art" leaving the lawyers to bill $400/hour while > they argue over whether or not Caddyshack is "art". Though the movie > might have inspired this: > http://www.rodenator.com/ > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2386436112453851581 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2umEFHeo6mw > > Looks fun as long as you don't do this: > http://uk.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUKN2432304520080326
In something of the same vein: <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4593682.stm> ... IMHO the pendejo got what was coming to him, though. Back to work, but I really appreciate some of the meanderings here. Greg Williamson Senior DBA DigitalGlobe Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. (My corporate masters made me say this.)
