"Jeffrey Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For this query, work_mem is 100MB and maintenance_work_mem is 1GB, on a > system with 8GB of memory. Notably I just installed a new storage subsystem > and upgraded to 8.3.1 less than a week ago, so my experience with this > instance is somewhat limited. Creating the table in this case takes half an > hour and then indexing it requires almost an hour.
These numbers seem to me to be pretty strong evidence that maintenance_work_mem = 1GB is a mistake. Try it at 100MB and then some intermediate values. Now, *why* it is a mistake is interesting to speculate about, but let's confirm the theory first. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers