"Nathan Boley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given that, wouldn't it be smarter to consider a value as an mcv
> candidate iff it has a density greater than 0.005, rather than having
> a count greater than 1.5*average?
Yeah, perhaps ... want to experiment with that? Though I'd be a bit
worried about how to get the threshold right, seeing that it will
depend a whole lot on what the user has selected for random_page_cost
and other parameters.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
