If the version of the master and the slave is different and we'd still like to allow log shipping replication, we need a negotiation if WAL format for the two is compatible. I hope it is not in our scope and I'm worrying too much.
2008/6/5 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Koichi Suzuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, WAL format doesn't only depend on WAL itself, but also depend on >> each resource manager. If we introduce WAL format version >> identification, ISTM that we have to take care of the matching of >> resource manager in the master and the slave as well. > > That seems a bit overdesigned. What are the prospects that two builds > of the same Postgres version are going to have different sets of > resource managers in them? > > regards, tom lane > -- ------ Koichi Suzuki -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
