2008/6/4 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2008/6/4 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Huh? That's completely nonsensical ... where will you determine the >>> type of the array, if you don't have a sample element? > >> it is nonsens in current postgres. But null array is castable to anyarray no? > > If you mean an array of nulls, it still has to have an element type.
I know it - but there was discus about untyped array for empty arrays like ARRAY[] it is little bit similar > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
