On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:21:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ugh :-(.
This is why I didn't want to go that route. :-)
> I have not spent much time looking at the ecpg grammar, so feel free to
> laugh this off, but I had the impression that all the rules derived from
> the backend grammar have boilerplate action sections (ie, just join the
This is true.
> strings together). So I was hoping that we could leave the backend's
> .y file more or less as-is, and write a perl script that would go
> through it and replace each { ... } action with a suitable cat_str call,
> which it could build on-the-fly by counting the number of rule tokens.
There is some small magic to know when to have blanks in between and
when not, but that should be doable.
> Then combine that output with the ecpg-specific rules taken from a
> separate source file. Obviously there would have to be a few small
This might work. Anyone with good perl knowledge interested?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
