On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 08:21 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:12:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This part is a deal-killer. It's a giant up-hill slog to sell warm > standby to those in charge of making resources available because the > warm standby machine consumes SA time, bandwidth, power, rack space, > etc., but provides no tangible benefit, and this feature would have > exactly the same problem. > > IMHO, without the ability to do read-only queries on slaves, it's not > worth doing this feature at all. The only question I have is... what does this give us that PITR doesn't give us? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
