Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Another theory is that we broke something recently, but I see no obvious
>> candidates in the CVS logs --- and I've spent the evening running 488
>> cycles of the parallel regression tests here, with no error.
> It looks to me like a psql bug rather than a server bug.
Interesting theory, but it doesn't fit the facts: the extra error is in
the server log too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
