Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If you estimate that a process dispatch cycle is ~ 10 microseconds, >> then waking 999 useless processes every 10 msec is just about enough >> to consume 100% of the CPU doing nothing useful... > Don't we back off the sleeps or was that code removed? Not enough to affect this calculation. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii