Am Montag, 21. April 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > That sounds like a pretty bad idea, since it would treat ordering > differences as insignificant even when they aren't --- for example, > an ordering difference in the output of a query that *has* an > ORDER BY is usually a bug.
Well, we wouldn't treat ordering differences as OK, but we could print foo ... FAILED (only ordering differences) which might give a clue. Then again, the effort to make this bulletproof might be more than continuing to field the occasional question about the issue. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
