-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:57:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:48:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I expect you intend to get at least the hooks in, right?
[...] > libpqtypes was designed to handle this with our without hooking. (the > 'hooking' debate was mainly about exactly how libpq and libpqtypes was > going to be separated). > > libpqtypes had a superclassing concept (not much discussed on the > lists) where you could introduce new type handlers that wrapped > existing ones and was desgined exactly for things like this. That sounds cool. So in a way you do have the hooks. That would be the libpqtypes without the types, no? > keep an > eye on our upcoming pgfoundry project. I sure will. Thanks - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIBaFWBcgs9XrR2kYRAgHNAJ9L59j9eHw0EkZ5Imzg5txAX1lF4ACcCbgS 6bgw0sejoFlCbHXvV55kimo= =QuvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
