Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Csaba Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> For interactive use in the above mentioned scenario you can use the
>> 'screen' command and start as many psqls as needed
> Sure, or you could just start multiple xterms or emacs shell buffers
> (my preferred setup).
Yeah, that's an awfully good point, and I have to admit I'd generally
prefer multiple xterms too.
> But I'm sure there are people who would prefer C-z too.
AFAICT, supporting C-z will add a pretty significant increment of
definitional complexity, implementation complexity, and portability
risks to what otherwise could be a relatively small patch. I don't
want to buy into that just because "some people might use it".
I note also that if we start trapping C-z, it would stop working
for what it works for now, namely suspending psql so you can do
something else in that window.
So, +1 for thinking about this entirely as a scripting feature.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
