Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Thanks for correction. I don't have yet PG8.3 on my production server and > I was convinced with good autovacuum marketing that is "ultimate > solution". :-)
It is not perfect yet. It's improving -- keep in mind it's rather new. However, I doubt "vacuumdb -a" is the thing to use when autovac is "not good enough", because in those cases what typically happens is that there are huge tables, or tables with high update rates, so a simple vacuum-all-tables-in-all-databases would be similarly useless. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
