I think that using INNER JOIN between nl and n (on n.nid=nl.nid) or
joining those tables in a subquery might work.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Is there some way to write the above so that it evaluates:
>
> WHERE (n.type = 'A' OR n.type = 'N' OR n.type = 'H' OR n.type = 'C')
> AND (nl.id = 15748 AND contact_lvl = 'company')
> AND n.nid = nl.nid
>
> first, so that it only has to do the LEFT JOIN on the *one* n.nid that is
> returned, instead of the 86736 that are in the table?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
