On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:55:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Why do we keep the TODO file with the source code? Wouldn't it make > >> more sense to store it separately? > > > No idea --- it has always been there because it relates directly to the > > source. > > I kinda like the fact that the diffs get posted to pgsql-committers; > it provides an easy chance to complain if the TODO description is off > base, which isn't too unusual.
I personally find that quite annoying :-) For each commit we get both the diff posted to committers, and the reply from Bruce saying "Added to TODO". Both of which also contani the actual text... Ok, you're going to be soooo surprised to hear this from me... But... How about we move it to the wiki. AFAIK we can still lock it down to who can edit it if we want to (which may for the TODO certainly be a good idea). You can still get diffs. I think you can get them in the mail if you want it (using watches), and I think you can also get it as an RSS feed. > What I'd like to have taken out of CVS is all the FAQs ... I find the > diff traffic on those to be noise. But others probably see that > differently. +1 (at least, I'd + more than 1 if I was allowed to) Once again, to the big surprise of a lot of people I'm sure, how about the wiki? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
