Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +0000 > "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a > > wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know > > that's true at least for me. If I want people to review my patch, I'm > > ready to sing and dance if that's what it takes. But if there's extra > > steps in reviewing a patch, I might just not bother. > > Well that is what my email is about, dropping extra steps :).
I agree that that's a good objective, but I think a Wiki makes for a crappy patch tracker. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
