-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:29:13 -0300 Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Right at the moment the raw data is still in Bruce's patch queue. > > > It's becoming increasingly obvious that that isn't going to work; > > > we can't have one man being a complete bottleneck for the entire > > > process. I concur with your other suggestion to try to move to > > > a wiki-based patch list, though it's unclear to me just how we > > > should manage that. I think I'd prefer a small number of people > > > (but more than just Bruce) responsible for updating the queue. > > > > Consider I am collecting all our open items from the past 10 > > months. Even when I am done the patch queue is going to be a load > > of work --- take a look at what is there now. > > We need storage of patches _outside_ our current patch queue. O.k. this is ugly, probably shouldn't be done, and I may be flamed into oblivion for this but since we aren't using some kind of bug tracker that will detach the patches etc... Have we considered a read only imap server with a patches account that anyone can attach to with their email client to pull patches? Or, just a web-email interface that would allow someone to download the attachment? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH0W/pATb/zqfZUUQRAsBmAJ9afIUgsuN+26zjbdk8MHcfX9755QCeISM6 zxcu/CxQYN2ujjovJXrm2H8= =E+FF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
