-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:31:14 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So on reflection I'm now inclined to say we should not change what > > we are now doing, which is simply to allow the db owner to install > > and control access to the language. > > +1. It's worth pointing out here that we just changed the rules in > 8.3 to make this easier. We should at least wait to gain some field > experience with 8.3 before we conclude that we need to change them > again. Not really sure what to think here. On the one hand I agree that since the dbowner can load it at their leisure its cool. On the other hand I wonder why we continue to add extra unnecessary steps to our life. Yes, it is a simple step but it is one that doesn't need to be taken, so why are we making people expend the calories on it? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHvwj/ATb/zqfZUUQRAnbeAJ0QOGN6oNs+IzdQLpB9VZ2p1grmegCeN4Zc ZbOO5Rg1fPce1eIFdx+YAWs= =rqrK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
