On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:42:07AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:45 +0600, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> 
> > What about allowing shared_buffers to be only greater than it was at
> > server start and allocating the extra shared_buffers in one or more
> > additional shm segments?
> 
> Sounds possible.

If we build that, it's probably not a far stretch to just allocate
shared memory as a number of smaller segments; that would allow us to
grow as well as shrink.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Attachment: pgpFetFksUT9a.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to