> One problem with keeping it is that interface coders are getting > confused by some of the unused system table columns, assuming they mean > something, when in fact they don't. Both ODBC and JDBC have had this > problem that I fixed today. Imho the correct answer to this would be to implement the SQL standard system views, and make all interfaces use those. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy Nathan Myers