On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote: > > Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"? > > This seems like a bad factorization ... > > After some more thought: I think that what's bugging me is that "fsec_t" > is intended to denote "fractional seconds". The other cases you have > here seem not to be intended to be "fractional hours" or "fractional > minutes". I'm not quite sure what the right abstraction is, but it > doesn't seem to be that.
I thought it meant "field seconds". That's why I used fhour_t and fminute_t. I'll think about a better name. wt ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
