Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Paranoia would > > suggest forbidding *any* form of ALTER TABLE when there are pending > > trigger events, but maybe that's unnecessarily strong. > > That works for me. Such a combination makes no sense, so banning it is > the right thing to do.
I disagree. This is an implementation limitation, so it makes sense to try to restrict the user as least as possible. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
