On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 11:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > I agree that replication should be able to be monitored. However, > > > isn't ps_display supposed to show what the process is _currently_ doing? > > > So if the archiver finishes processing a file, its display should go > > > back to "idle" or some such. (Perhaps "idle, last archived XXXYYYZZZ") > > > > That was my first thought, but that ends up with the archiver ps display > > being mostly blank, and so isn't really very useful. > > What about the second suggestion?
Sorry. My preference is terse, but that looks fine to me. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
