Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A 5-line patch which improves performance by 40% for any case sounds amazing,
> but how fragile is that gain? The kind of thing which would be worryign is if
> runing a query which uses both varchar and some other ambiguous operator
> causes it to lose all its gain.

Yeah, exactly.  If we're going to risk anything like this at all, the
cache-of-one restriction is simply not acceptable (especially given
that the part of the coding it would eliminate is the simplest and
easiest-to-get-right part).

In the test case Guillame provided, every single WHERE clause happens
to be of the form
        varchar_column = 'unknown-type literal'
and there are no other operators used in the SELECT lists; but I can
hardly believe that this is representative of any significant number
of real-world applications.  Even pgbench uses more than one operator.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to