-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 16, 2007 18:00:26 +0000 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> Maybe the BF members could just run their default autoconf as part of the >>> build if they have one. >> >> you lost me on that one ... Tom is hestitant about moving to 6.1 because we >> don't know what the fall out will be ... since I imagine the fallout would >> be in the configure/build stage, if we modified CVS to have a 6.1 configure >> script in place, wouldn't the buildfarm servers not be a good means to test >> *if* there is any fallout? > > If the first thing some of them do is re-run autoconf, then we should get > test results for a variety of versions as found on various distros. We would > then be able to tell which versions may or may not work which could help us > when we need to upgrade, or if someone has problems with a specific version > when hacking (which should be rare I appreciate). Ah, okay, you are going for the 'remove pre-built configure from cvs' route .. that works too, and does make sense ... wouldn't definitely make sure we get broad coverage ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHPdwq4QvfyHIvDvMRAiqvAKDdtV+AtsFZe9WkbG+7GYPRs+0zvQCeJGxX pY3WUGVHUgXtU1mfYIGAfBo= =wyE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
