> Second: if VACUUM can run in the background, then there's no reason not > to run it fairly frequently. In fact, it could become an automatically > scheduled activity like CHECKPOINT is now, or perhaps even a continuously > running daemon (which was the original conception of it at Berkeley, BTW). Maybe it's obvious, but I'd like to mention that you need some way of setting priority. If it's a daemon, or a process, you an nice it. If not, you need to implement something by yourself. -- Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582 Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2501 Howitzvej 75 Åben 14.00-18.00 Web: www.suse.dk 2000 Frederiksberg Lørdag 11.00-17.00 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Matthew T. O'Connor
- [HACKERS] Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tim Allen
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Kaare Rasmussen
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM proble... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM pr... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUU... Vadim Mikheev