On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
> > Win camp could be seperated also ...
>
> > pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
>
> A windows list seems like a good idea. But I'm not sure that a
> separate list for RPMs is a good idea. In the first place, it's
> fuzzy: is it to be used just for RPM packaging discussion, or is it
> going to draw off --- for example --- all bug reports from people who
> happen to have installed from RPM instead of source? I suppose the
> former is intended, but it's not going to be clear to people. I think
> we've already got too many lists with fuzzy boundaries. In the second
> place, the RPM packaging discussion is quite sporadic; I think the
> traffic would be nil except at times when Lamar is working on new
> RPMs.
That's why I wasn't sure how to classify the RPM one ...
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
