Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Btw., it would really seem like a neat feature if a given pg_dump suite
> would also handle the respective previous version. Otherwise we're in a
> situation like now where we've got a shiny new pg_dump but people that
> want to upgrade are still stuck with the broken 7.0 incarnation.
No more stuck than they were if they had needed to reload from their
dump files into 7.0.
I really doubt that it's worth going out of our way to try to keep
pg_dump compatible with obsolete backends. If we had infinite manpower,
then sure, but I think the time is better spent elsewhere.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- [HACKERS] HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v... Joel Burton
- [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump fr... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dum... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ..... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRE... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg... D'Arcy J.M. Cain
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ..... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dum... Vince Vielhaber
