> >> Suddenly I obtain access to > >> ULTRIX black 4.3 1 RISC > > Uh ... what kind of processor is that? Offhand I don't see any > > indication that any of the entries in s_lock.h are supposed to work > > for Ultrix. As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor. DEC implemented OSF-1 for their Alpha processors. > I suspect that some one of the implementations in s_lock.h was intended > to be usable on Ultrix, and we've somehow dropped the declarations > needed to make it go. You might want to pull down an old tarball (6.3 > or before) and look at how it compiles the s_lock support on Ultrix. Any hints for Alexander on how to do it *if* it is a MIPS processor? - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Alexander Klimov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Doug McNaught
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platform... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Mathijs Brands
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tom Lane
- Regression test on FBSD 3.... Mathijs Brands
- Re: Regression test on FBS... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Regression t... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: Regression test on FBS... Peter Eisentraut