Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For the regression test, I got 7 failures, most of them seem harmless, > the only concern I have is bit test though. Most of the diffs derive from what I recall to be a known SunOS problem, that strtol fails to notice overflow. A value that should be rejected is getting inserted into int4_tbl (mod 2^32 of course). The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being 8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platform... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tatsuo Ishii
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Alexander Klimov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane