> > BTW, I've got ~320tps with 50 clients inserting (int4, text[1-256]) > > records into 50 tables (-B 16384, wal_buffers = 256) on Ultra10 > > with 512Mb RAM, IDE (clients run on the same host as server). > > Not bad. What were you getting before these recent changes? As I already reported - with O_DSYNC this test shows 30% better performance than with fsync. (BTW, seems in all my tests I was using -O0 flag...) Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Stuck spins in current Bruce Momjian