Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010315 09:35] wrote: >> BTW, are there any platforms where O_DSYNC exists but has a different >> spelling? > Yes, FreeBSD only has: O_FSYNC > it doesn't have O_SYNC nor O_DSYNC. Okay ... we can fall back to O_FSYNC if we don't see either of the others. No problem. Any other weird cases out there? I think Andreas might've muttered something about AIX but I'm not sure now. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL ... Larry Rosenman
- Testing structure (was) Re: [HA... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Bruce Momjian