The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How do people feel about adding a single handler to 7.1? > Totally dead set against it ... Ditto. Particularly a signal handler that performs I/O. That's going to create all sorts of re-entrancy problems. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Gordon A. Runkle
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monit... Gunnar R|nning
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Denis Perchine
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor Gunnar R|nning
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor' Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Mike Mascari