On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber writes:
>
> > http://hub.org/~vev/regress.php
> >
> > What other info is needed to distinguish these systems?
>
> The operating systems should be ordered by some key other than maybe
> author's preference. ;-)
Actually it's more random than by preference. FreeBSD came first 'cuze
I run it and I always list it first (and alphabetically it comes before
Linux). I then kept the bsds together, but those were actually added
last. Some of the others came from looking at the directory where the
FAQs reside and going in that order.
> Linux needs to be split into one for each distribution.
I need a list of them since the only ones I can think of are redhat, suse
and slackware (does slackware even still exist?).
> 'Sun' should probably be SunOS.
Ok.
> Also of interest:
>
> - config.guess output
comes later. This is mainly for machine identification. But it is noted
since I didn't think of it.
> - Linker version
>
> - GNU make version
>
> - configure command line (`pg_config --configure`)
Comes later.
> Bison version is probably not interesting, since anything but 1.28 is not
> to be considered serious.
>
> 'Platform' could be better named 'CPU type'. 'CPU speed' and 'Total RAM'
> are probably not interesting for anything but statistics.
Changed platform.
> 'libc' version is probably not interesting for anything but Linux? If
> so, it is already implied if you name the distributor.
And if someone upgrades libc? I add that 'cuze when a friend of mine was
using redhat for his isp (quite a while ago) someone upgraded his libc for
him - what a mess that made!
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net
128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
