Justin Clift wrote: > > I was just thinking that perhaps as part of the "beta" release process > it would be worthwhile saying "New beta about to be released" (or > similar) and then have the appropriate people for each platform/OS do a > compile against the up-to-the-minute CVS and give a yes/no for each of > their platforms. What would the big advantage to releasing the beta and testing _that_ be ? Apart from delaying the beta, that is ;) ? It would be nice if someone (pgsql inc., great bridge, etc.) provided a central web page for registering the results so that you won't need to scan athe whole list to find out if your platform is already tested. ---------- Hannu
- AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: AW: Re: beta5 ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Justin Clift
- RE: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- RE: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Vince Vielhaber