Tom Lane writes: > How hard would it be to make the --with-includes -I directives appear > after our own? Not hard, but tedious. > The same problem arises for --with-libs, btw. Not tedious, but hard. I'll look into it. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- [HACKERS] Ordering problem with --with-includes Tom Lane
- Peter Eisentraut