I did not realize how much WAL improved performance when using fsync. > > "Schmidt, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So, is it OK to use commit_delay=0? > > > > Certainly. In fact, I think that's about to become the default ;-) > > I agree with Tom. I did some benchmarking tests using pgbench for a > computer magazine in Japan. I got a almost equal or better result for > 7.1 than 7.0.3 if commit_delay=0. See included png file. > -- > Tatsuo Ishii [ Attachment, skipping... ] -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 b... Dave Mertens
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 b... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1... Tatsuo Ishii
- RE: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Dmitry Morozovsky