Tom Lane writes: > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is > > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it? > > I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and > I'll object to any attempt to remove the option. The description should be updated though: http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do if I turn off fsync anyway." -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system... Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after sy... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failin... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL after sy... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL after sy... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL afte... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL... Ryan Kirkpatrick