> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The example startup file is outdated and broken. Don't use it.
> >
> > Er ... shouldn't we fix it? Or remove it?
>
> See my message on -hackers, "Sparc/Linux patch" thing follow-up.
>
> The bottom line is that, IMHO, writing a portable init.d style (or any
> other such concept) startup file that is ready for blind use is beyond
> practicality. It might be better to collect a few of the ones that are
> being used now (Red Hat-style, SuSE-style, Debian, *BSD-style) and ship
> them. This should be coordinated with the packagers, though.
>
Should I remove init.d from /contrib?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
