Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gist__int_ops | 1007 > gist__intbig_ops | 1007 > we want gist__int_ops to be default index opclass. > If we delete gist__intbig_ops entry from opclass, then we couldn't use > gist__intbig_ops ! Put in gist__intbig_ops with zero for the default type. You should never have more than one entry in pg_opclass claiming to be the default for a given type OID. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-int... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarra... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-int... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contri... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version o... Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] New version of co... Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] Re: New version o... Tom Lane