Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone

[Trond Eivind Glomsrød]

Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > No, UNIX sockets are specifically mentioned as belonging under /var/run.
> > In section 5.10 "/var/run : Run-time variable data", it says: "Programs
> > that maintain transient UNIX-domain sockets should place them in this
> > directory."
> > 
> > So what ever the outcome for the wider PostgreSQL community, I must make
> > the change to conform to Debian policy.
> 
> So, if PostgreSQL is a part of Debian, then there will be problems if
> the client-server situation isn't somehow fixed to allow robust
> location-independent socket finding.
> 
> Looks like the same thing is going to happen with RedHat's
> distribution.  So, if this is going to occur, let's get a consensus as
> to where that alternate location (barring some other solution) is going
> to be, so that there are the fewest variants out there.

FHS is a good starting (and end-) point.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.