Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would probably be better if the socket files weren't in /tmp but in > a postgres-owned directory. However, at this point we have a huge > backwards compatibility problem to overcome if we want to move the > socket files. Not to sound scheptical, but since when did postgresql care about backwards compatiblity? Upgrading is already demanding a lot of knowledge from the user (including needing such information, which almost no other package do), this is just a minor change (the files are mostly used by bundled tools - any exceptions?) > There is an option in 7.1 to support defining a different directory > for the socket files, but I doubt very many people will use it. I intend to, for the RPMs we ship. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... GB Clark II
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alfred Perlstein
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock fil... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough,... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough,... Florent Guillaume
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure eno... Tom Lane