> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, added to TODO:
> > * Allow NOTIFY in rules
> >>
> >> Uh, what does that have to do with the problem? It's certainly not
> >> an accurate rendering of either the current or proposed status ...
>
> > Oops, can you give me a line. What was the issue?
>
> "Allow NOTIFY in conditional rules" would be an approximation. It's
> not the whole story though, because presently we also have to fail
> if the rule is applied to a query with conditions, even if the rule
> itself is unconditional. As of my last commit:
>
> regression=# create rule r1 as on update to int4_tbl do notify foo;
> CREATE
> regression=# update int4_tbl set f1 = f1;
> UPDATE 5
> regression=# update int4_tbl set f1 = f1 where f1 < 0;
> ERROR: Conditional NOTIFY is not implemented
>
> which is pretty ugly but at least it doesn't pretend to do something
> it can't, which was the 7.0 behavior. (In 7.0 you'd have gotten a
> NOTIFY whether the update updated any rows or not.)
Added to TODO:
* Allow NOTIFY in rules involving conditionals
This covers both cases of conditionals in the rule or the query.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
