> Actually, I think a more interesting question is "should CHECKPOINT > have permission restrictions? If so, what should they be?" > > A quite relevant precedent is that Unix systems (at least the ones > I've used) do not restrict who can call sync(). Checkpoints 1. affect entire system, 2. increase log output and 3. it's hard operation. Command itself was added mostly for debug purposes. Vadim
- [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Oliver Elphick
- RE: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] PQprint KuroiNeko
- Re: [HACKERS] PQprint Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKP... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on CHECKPOINT Tom Lane